Book Club Review: Sharp Objects

When I finished Gone Girl, I knew I wanted to read more Gillian Flynn ASAP. I knew of Sharp Objects and Dark Places and downloaded the latter before we left for Jamaica.

355991

 

Sharp Objects by Gillian Flynn:

WICKED above her hipbone, GIRL across her heart 
Words are like a road map to reporter Camille Preaker’s troubled past. Fresh from a brief stay at a psych hospital, Camille’s first assignment from the second-rate daily paper where she works brings her reluctantly back to her hometown to cover the murders of two preteen girls.

NASTY on her kneecap, BABYDOLL on her leg
Since she left town eight years ago, Camille has hardly spoken to her neurotic, hypochondriac mother or to the half-sister she barely knows: a beautiful thirteen-year-old with an eerie grip on the town. Now, installed again in her family’s Victorian mansion, Camille is haunted by the childhood tragedy she has spent her whole life trying to cut from her memory.

HARMFUL on her wrist, WHORE on her ankle
As Camille works to uncover the truth about these violent crimes, she finds herself identifying with the young victims—a bit too strongly. Clues keep leading to dead ends, forcing Camille to unravel the psychological puzzle of her own past to get at the story. Dogged by her own demons, Camille will have to confront what happened to her years before if she wants to survive this homecoming.

With its taut, crafted writing, Sharp Objects is addictive, haunting, and unforgettable.

 

The description is more exciting than the book. I was a little disappointed. I loved Gone Girl, and it really surprised me with all it’s twists and turns, but I was far less wowed with Sharp Objects. The story has potential, and the writing is quick and enthralling like GG, but it seems a lot more … obvious? I can’t think of the right words to describe this, but nothing shocked me in this book. It seemed very disjointed like a much longer novel stuffed into 300 pages. There wasn’t a lot of character development, and the plot had some pretty big holes. Like GG, it’s a haunting book that will stick with you, and it is a quick read, but I hope Dark Places has a little more to offer.

Book Club Review: The Dog Stars

For the first book review of the new year (can that be possible? I’m not sure it’s true, but it just might be as I was a study machine prior to last month) I’m going to try and keep it shorter than last year’s reviews.

I recently finished The Dog Stars by Peter Heller

13330761

 

This book came recommended by a friend who I trust for book recommendations. The summary describes it as:

A riveting, powerful novel about a pilot living in a world filled with loss—and what he is willing to risk to rediscover, against all odds, connection, love, and grace.

Hig survived the flu that killed everyone he knows. His wife is gone, his friends are dead, he lives in the hangar of a small abandoned airport with his dog, his only neighbor a gun-toting misanthrope. In his 1956 Cessna, Hig flies the perimeter of the airfield or sneaks off to the mountains to fish and to pretend that things are the way they used to be. But when a random transmission somehow beams through his radio, the voice ignites a hope deep inside him that a better life—something like his old life—exists beyond the airport. Risking everything, he flies past his point of no return—not enough fuel to get him home—following the trail of the static-broken voice on the radio. But what he encounters and what he must face—in the people he meets, and in himself—is both better and worse than anything he could have hoped for.

Narrated by a man who is part warrior and part dreamer, a hunter with a great shot and a heart that refuses to harden, The Dog Stars is both savagely funny and achingly sad, a breathtaking story about what it means to be human.

(source)

I liked the way the book was written. It’s hard to describe, but it’s closest to stream of consciousness. I thought it was a beautiful way of narrating a post-apocalyptic themed novel. It really captured the loneliness. The Dog Stars is in two parts, and I felt like they were disjointed. I liked each part, but I couldn’t tie them together mentally, and that bothered me.

I generally enjoy post-apocalyptic stories, but in this case, it was more of a background theme, which is fine; just don’t go into it expecting to know anything more than the bare bones facts surrounding the end of the world. Mostly The Dog Stars is about love and loss and love again and loss again. Due to the narrative style, all the emotions are understated but raw and beautiful in their simplicity.

It took me a while to get through The Dog Stars, and I never really felt like I got into it, but I thoroughly enjoyed reading it, and would definitely recommend it.

 

Book Club Review: Midwives

Hi there! It’s been such a long time since I’ve checked in. I hope everyone’s 2013 New Year’s Resolutions are off to a great start, and if they’re not, that’s ok too. Whether you make a big change in January, February, August or December, change is good!

I’ve been meaning to do a post on our New Year’s Eve Party, but that requires me to take the pictures off the real camera and put them here, and well… life. Sorry, it’s coming. Probably before 2014.

For now, I’d like to talk about Midwives.

midwives

 

This month’s book club pick was Midwives by Chris Bohjalian. I had such funny feelings about this book. As I was reading it, I kept thinking, “I don’t like this book.” Yet, I couldn’t put it down. I needed to know what happened. It’s like this book tricked me into liking it.

The story is about a midwife named Sybil, but it’s told by her now grown daughter Connie. Connie, now an OBGYN reflects back on The Event and aftermath that rocked her 14 year old world and changed her family’s life.

I was immediately intrigued by this book because the author, Chris Bohjalian, is actually a man, but he writes so fluently from the perspective of both 14 year old Connie and hyper feminine midwife Sybil, and I really respect him for taking on that challenge.

Typically, I don’t fully enjoy suspenseful novels because I find myself racing through the pages to get to the critical moment that the book will inevitably hinge on. In the case of Midwives though, the night that will change everything is described almost immediately, and the rest of the story is basically an in depth examination of the details of Charlotte Bedford’s labor and delivery as well as the differing perspectives of the characters involved.

What kept me thinking that I didn’t like the book was that I couldn’t connect with any of the characters. Connie was brave, but so stoic that I found it difficult to relate to her, and Sybil was so intense; I wondered if she cared about what her decisions had done to her family at all. In the end, it was clear that she loved her family very much, but it was too little, too late for me at that point.

Midwives redeemed itself and kept me reading through it’s subject matter which I feel is especially relevant today.  It feels to me like home births are making a come back in modern society, and there’s a lot of debate as to whether or not that’s really a good thing. I don’t think the book will answer that question for you, but it will make you consider it. Maybe just don’t read it while you’re pregnant.

This month’s book is The Dog Stars by Peter Heller. If you’ve read it or are reading it, let me know what your thoughts on it are!

Book Club Review: Gone Girl

Oh baby. This one was a doozie. Gone Girl by Gillian Flynn is the type of book you need to just take a deep breath after reading.

 

I really don’t want to spoil this book for anyone, so I’ll keep this review short and vague. First, let me say that I’m so glad I picked the Thanksgiving long weekend to read this book otherwise my work would have surely suffered as I stayed up every night just tearing through this book. Seriously, one night I stayed up reading until 2:30 in the morning. I honestly can’t remember the last time I’ve been up that late.

The book starts with a bang on the morning of Amy and Nick Dunne’s fifth wedding anniversary. Nick comes home from work to find his wife has disappeared under suspicious circumstances. As the story progresses, Nick becomes the prime suspect, but did he do it?

Gone Girl is written from the present perspective of Nick from the past perspective of Amy via diary entries from the day she and Nick meet to the day of her disappearance. Considering that Nick is narrating, I was shocked that I could not form an opinion on whether or not I thought he did it.

I pride myself on being very hard to fool. I generally don’t enjoy suspense novels because I can usually figure out what’s going to happen #humblebrag. The only exceptions to this have been The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo series and 11/22/63 and now this. There was literally a point in the book where I sat up from the couch and said, “Shut the front door!” (we’re trying to work on our cursing) and had to quickly explain to Chris everything that had happened because I could not believe it.

I feel like I always have something negative to say in these reviews. Honestly, it’s just a part of my personality. I guess I can be a little critical. Truly, I loved this book. It’s a great read that I would recommend to anyone. I just have to add that I liked the first half more than the second. I felt that the second dragged just a bit for me as compared to the thrilling suspense in the first half.

The ending thrilled me though. I know some people found it far fetched, but I loved it. I thought it was completely in line with the tone of the book and succinctly ended the story for me.

One question for anyone’s who’s read, and this isn’t a spoiler, but what was in the silver box?? Is it every explained? It didn’t start driving me crazy until I read the Amazon summary, but now I need to know.

Ok, so read this book, but don’t expect to sleep until you’ve finished it, and even then you might have some trouble.

Book Club Review: The Paris Wife

First, let me say Happy Thanksgiving a million years late! I hope you and yours had a happy and delicious holiday.

I spent the day with Chris and his very Italian family. It’s always funny to see how others celebrate. While there was more pasta on the table than turkey, there were a lot of similarities too, and we had a really fun time. I managed to take zero pictures, so you get a day after picture of the cats staking out the leftovers.

On to the book… Last month’s book club selection was The Paris Wife by Paula McLain. This was the first book that I hadn’t finished by the time we met for book club, but I’m glad it worked out that way. As of our book club meeting, I was 60% through and not interested enough to finish, but after hearing everyone’s thoughts, I was motivated to read on.

The Paris Wife is written from the perspective of Hadley Richardson, Ernest Hemingway’s first wife. While the book does provide some background into Hadley’s early life, it essentially starts the story when Richardson and Hemingway meet.

After meeting and exchanging months of letters, the two wed with the intention of moving to Italy. At the last minute, Hemingway is informed by a contemporary that Paris is actually the place to be, so that’s where they go.

The book is peppered with nods to then starving-artist, now famous contemporaries of Hemingway. Unfortunately, The Lost Generation is not a group I’m familiar with, so I’m sure I missed a lot of references. Some names, like Picasso, Gertrude Stein and F. Scott Fitzgerald are impossible to miss, so the book still had it’s period charm.

Hemingway makes it clear that his life is centered around his work, but it’s evident that he loves Hadley. The problem is that he loves her for the man that she makes him and the grounding presence she adds to his life rather than for who she is as a person. Hemingway’s perpetual self-centeredness is immediately apparent.

Still, Hadley seems completely thrilled to be in Paris loving Ernest and allowing his work to take top priority. Although she can’t always understand him, she supports him faithfully. Unfortunately, things begin to go south fairly quickly.

From the beginning, it is evident that Hadley is an exception to the rule in post World War I Paris. She has traditional values and expects a monogamous marriage and a family, which puts her at odds with the free-loving artists in the couple’s social circle. Still, Hadley maintains her sense of self and proves herself willing to try almost anything. Almost.

Hadley tolerates Ernest’s hectic schedule, flighty behavior and almost non existent income but is finally undone by another woman. This isn’t really a spoiler as the book is a work of historical fiction, and a quick Wikipedia reference will show Hemingway married four times in his life, and it doesn’t really come as a surprise in the book either.

Hemingway holds a charm that attracts both men and women, but he is constantly betraying or isolating himself from the people who love and support him. It isn’t surprising that once he finally gets a break (with the release of The Sun Also Risesthat he begins betraying Hadley in the form of an affair with a friend of a friend.

When Hadley learns of the affair and confronts Ernest, he becomes upset with her for bringing the issues to light and for her unwillingness to allow Pauline to become a part of their married life. Yes, he expects his wife to accept his mistress into some plural marriage agreement.

Unsurprisingly, Hadley will not allow it and, after a brief attempt at keeping Hemingway and Pauline apart for 100 days, decides it’s best that she and Ernest divorce.

I lost interest in the book at this point because I felt like the author didn’t do a good job of conveying Hadley’s emotions.  She would mention that Hadley was distraught or miserable, but the narration had the same flat affect throughout the entire book. It felt more like reading a biography of Hadley Richardson than a first person (fictional) account.

However, I found myself really liking Hadley and really disliking Hemingway, so after I learned in book club that Hadley walked away with a much better life ahead of her, I had to finish the book.

It’s true; good things come to Hadley Richardson. While at first, I thought her undying devotion to Hemingway a sign of poor self esteem, my final impression of her was that she was actually pretty fearless. Despite her friends and family, she married and moved to a different country with a struggling writer. Although she was often jarringly different from her peers, she maintained a genuine sense of self and was well liked by those around her. Even while truly in love with Ernest, she had the good sense to end their marriage before things got incredibly ugly.

As my grandparents would say, “she had a good head on her shoulders.” For that reason, the Paris Wife will have you rooting for Hadley Richardson until the end.

Book Club Review: The Psychopath Test

If there was one good thing to come out of Sandy, it was that I had a lot of time on my hands. I used at least part of that time to finally finish Jon Ronson’s The Psychopath Test.

 

I started this book (I think) when we were flying to Germany. I needed an actual (non-Kindle) book to read for those terrible 20 minutes during take off and landing when ALL electronic devices MUST be turned off. Yes, I need to read 100% of the time I’m on a plane or I panic, and yes I turn everything off even if the flight attendants aren’t looking because I’m a rule-follower like that.

I never finished it because it’s just easier to carry my Kindle with me, and I didn’t feel like downloading a book I had already purchased. However, being out of power felt like the perfect time to revert to good old fashioned book-books.

I first heard about this book on This American Life’s podcast and was fascinated. They focused on a specific part of the book that posits that the same qualities that define psychopathy also make for shrewd and often ruthless corporate executives. I love the human mind and all its intricacies, so I was hooked.

The book is really well written and surprisingly light for a meditation on madness. Don’t get me wrong, it has supremely creepy moments that made me regret reading it in the aftermath of a storm so devastating it left an almost post-apocalyptic landscape in its wake,  but Ronson’s style is excellent and pulls readers up from the trenches right before they’ve had enough.

Though The Psychopath Test does discuss a lot of the psychology behind psychopathy and other disorders, it never feels dense or dull. Ronson writes like a (very funny) friend who’s telling you about a report they saw on the news, so you feel like you’re really getting it.

While there is discussion of the qualities that both psychopaths and business-people share, more of the book is focused on what Ronson calls, “The Madness Industry.” He explores what makes some forms or degrees of madness (think reality television) intriguing and other forms too terrifyingly true to form (think the kind of story that makes you feel like maybe we’re all a little crazy). He also looks back on the history of psychology and at-home diagnosis and gets input from both opponents and supporters of the field.

If you enjoy psychology, you’ll love this book, but it’s certainly not a prerequisite. I’d recommend this to anyone looking for an interesting and entertaining read. Maybe just don’t read it before bed.

 

Book Club Review: The Beach Trees

I didn’t enjoy this book. I feel like I should say that right off the bat because I know that each person’s feelings about a book are very unique, and I could not stand to read a review of Love in the Time of Cholera written by someone who did not absolutely adore it.

Moving on, I just finished The Beach Trees by Karen White

I didn’t know anything at all about it except that it was September’s book club selection, so my original one line review as I was finishing the book was going to be, “Good story gets bogged down by immature writing style.” Imagine my surprise when the last page of my Kindle edition informed me that White is the author of 14 other novels. Oops. I’ve not heard of any save The Memory of Water, but I didn’t read that, and don’t know much about it.

I’m not sure where to start, so I suppose I’ll begin with what first struck me. I did not enjoy the writing. It’s very descriptive, but the descriptions often left me more confused about the mood White was trying to create. There are countless metaphors and inner musings that are intended to come across as sage advice, but I found them mostly meaningless. It reads like a thriller written by a romance novelist though even the romance is lackluster.

Secondly, there is way too much going on in this book. It’s about grown woman dealing with the childhood abduction of her sister. It’s about being thrust into the role of caregiver to the young son of a recently deceased best friend. It’s about New Orleans post hurricane Katrina. It’s about a family dealing with the disappearance of a sister and granddaughter (no, not the same sister). It’s about an older woman coming to terms with the death of her mother and husband. It’s about a dark and seedy family history. Too many things.

I’m not going to harp on what I consider wrong about each piece of that puzzle because Karen White has published 15 books, and I will probably be late on publishing this post, but to say the book lacks cohesion would be an understatement.

The mystery part of the story is okay, but not terribly thrilling. Within the first twenty pages I had an idea of where the book was going in my head, but figured there had to be some twists and turns thrown in there. There weren’t. It sometimes feels like the trivial details of the book (the timeline, the family tree) are purposefully confusing so as to distract from the fact that the shocking conclusion is actually pretty straightforward.

Not one character (except maybe the 5-year-old) behaves in a way any reasonable person would expect any other reasonable person to behave. I had a hard time visualizing any character because they seem more like aliens than actual humans based on their descriptions and actions. The main character, initially described as mature and urbane having come most recently from New York attends her first Mardi Gras parade. While there, someone hands her a steaming bowl of stew over rice to which she asks, “What is this?” only to be told that it is, of course, gumbo. What kind of grown woman would have to ask in that situation? Am I being presumptuous here?

Perhaps what bothered me the most was the author’s conception and presentation of time. It seems so silly to say, but the timing of the book made no sense. Most of the story is told through flashbacks, (a point which is a problem in itself: the flashback portions alone could have been fleshed out to provide a nice little mystery; the rest was superfluous) but the way the flashbacks are told to the present-day characters makes no sense. In order to provide ample “story telling time” the author makes it seem like all the characters are always either eating or in the car. We rarely sleep. We rarely work. We all just drive from point A to point B and then eat dinner. Here’s why this is confusing: while waiting at a traffic light, the speaker will present what would amount to 45 minutes of real time story telling. As the same two characters sit down for some piping hot chocolate, the speaker reveals a section of her tale that could not possibly amount to more than 3 minutes of talking yet the author informs us that both women have finished their hot chocolate and are ready for more. Maybe traffic lights are very long in the bayou, and maybe those women enjoy burnt mouths, but I doubt it. It just doesn’t make sense and is disorienting to say the least.

I’m going to end with what I like, but I’ll first touch on an issue I don’t have the authority to speak on extensively, but should at least mention. The book is set in New Orleans after Katrina (more on that in a minute). The main characters are white, and the author’s treatment of the two black main characters is not great. They are stereotyped to the point where it made me a little uncomfortable to read. The author must have feared this because there is a totally random encounter with a black US Army veteran thrown in (there was really no need to mention that she was black) that seems to make a case that White is trying to be well rounded in her treatment of minorities. I don’t know really. Read it for yourself and tell me what you think.

Anyway, back to the good. The author’s treatment of New Orleans and the surrounding gulf coast is really well done. I read on her Wikipedia that she went to Tulane, and that most of her books are set in the Southeast. She seems to really love the area. I’ve never been but the people and places are described so beautifully that it really made me want to visit.

Fewer competing story lines, more well rounded characters and greater attention to detail could have made a world of difference for this book. As it stands, it’s not a good read.

 

 

Book Club Review: 11/22/63

Early in the summer, I kept seeing 11/22/63 by Stephen King popping up all over the Internet place. While I like the occasional piece of historical fiction, it’s not my favorite, and my interests definitely don’t lie in the 1960s.

Luckily, I do know somebody very interested in modern American history… a certain handsome roommate of mine named Chris. He’d been struggling to find a book he could get into, so I recommended this, and he loved it! Like, I don’t think I’ve ever seen him so into a book. He could barely put it down. He kept urging me to read it, but I was skeptical. He assured me that you don’t need to know anything at all about Kennedy or the assassination to enjoy the book, so I decided to check it out.

I loved this book. I’m not going to delve into plot because it’s a thriller, and I don’t want to give anything away, but let me say, Chris was right (it pains me to type that). The book does an excellent job of explaining the days and circumstances surrounding JFK’s assassination in a way that is not at all reminiscent of US History II.

I immediately fell in love with the main character Jake Epping (what a  good name!) and his style. The book is written from his perspective, and you can almost hear his voice in your head as you read.

The story centers on time travel (you find this out almost immediately; I’m not ruining anything) which was another aspect that had me nervous. While I mostly enjoyed The Time Traveler’s Wife, I found it incredibly dense and confusing to an extent that took away from the story. I have a hard time just accepting things and going with them. I like to know how it all works, so time travel stories that with conflicting rules regarding the process drive me nuts. King describes his premise for time travel so succinctly that it covers barely a page. He doesn’t answer ever  question but rather deftly deflects some of the most common time travel quandaries. As an example, Jake asks his time travel guide “What would happen if I went back in time and killed my grandfather?” His guide smartly responds with something to the extent of, “Why would you do that??” Brilliant.

Another thing that normally bothers me regarding any books or movies that require you to suspend reality is the amount of time devoted to the main character accepting that something outside of the ordinary is occurring. Like, it always seems as if the person has all the evidence in front of them yet still insists that “time travel just doesn’t exist!” Ugh. We know you’re gonna do it, so let’s just speed up those moments of incredulity. King handles this masterfully too by creating a character who’s world view has already been rocked and so seems ready to accept even the oddest of turns.

King’s treatment of America’s past felt really well rounded. There is no idolization for an era that never really existed in the first place, nor does King seem overly apologetic for the mistakes (racist, narrow minded mistakes) of his predecessors. His character seems always to remember that he is viewing the past from a unique perspective.

The rest of the characters in the book are just as well rounded and likable (except for the ones you’re not supposed to like, of course), and the book doesn’t feel like a story about time travel or a piece of historical fiction. It’s just a good story. A good story that will definitely keep you on the edge of your seat.

Much to my surprise, I found myself unable to put this book down either. I broke my rule of never walking and reading (I’m absent minded enough as it is) and narrowly avoided a run in with a city bus as well as a close encounter with a tree just to keep reading.

I’ve never read anything else by Stephen King (though I’m thinking I should start), but the book has the same mysterious feel as movies adapted from his novels. You aren’t terrified when reading, but you do keep checking over your shoulder because of the pervasively creepy feeling.

I kept wagering guesses throughout the course of 11/22/63 as to what the final ending would be, but I realize now that I was way off the mark until about three quarters of the way through. Even then, I was only about sixty percent right. After finishing the book, I was glad I had Chris to discuss with (so maybe make this a book club selection, but beware it’s loooong) as the conclusion stuck with me for the next 72 hours.

I’ve been recommending this book to anyone in need of a good read, so I’ll just go ahead and recommend it to you to. Read this book; you won’t regret it.

Book Club Review: Hotel on the Corner of Bitter and Sweet

This month’s book club selection was Hotel on the Corner of Bitter and Sweet by Jamie Ford.

 

Originally, I planned on skipping it. I read the description:

In the opening pages of Jamie Ford’s stunning debut novel, Hotel on the Corner of Bitter and Sweet, Henry Lee comes upon a crowd gathered outside the Panama Hotel, once the gateway to Seattle’s Japantown. It has been boarded up for decades, but now the new owner has made an incredible discovery: the belongings of Japanese families, left when they were rounded up and sent to internment camps during World War II. As Henry looks on, the owner opens a Japanese parasol.

Now a widower, Henry is still trying to find his voice–words that might explain the actions of his nationalistic father; words that might bridge the gap between him and his modern, Chinese American son; words that might help him confront the choices he made many years ago. 

(source: amazon)

And I just wasn’t feeling it. I was right in the middle (53% according to Kindle) of 11/22/63 (drop everything. read this book now) and it’s very hard to put down. Plus, it seems incredibly sad, and it’s August, and I didn’t want to be sobbing on the beach. A friend of mine assured me it was a quick read, so I gave it a go, and I’m glad I did.

The book starts out a little slow. Readers are following Henry, a fifty-six year old who’s just lost his wife after a prolonged battle with cancer. He’s got one son he’s struggling to find common ground with and a past he’s trying to come to terms with. While out walking one day, he notices that the old Panama Hotel has captured the attention of passerby and the local media, so he ventures in and discovers what all the commotion is about.

The hotel’s new owners have unearthed the belongings left behind by Seattle area Japanese families who were sent to internment camps during World War II. The items evoke a memory in Henry, and the book takes off.

The story vacillates between past and present as it recounts Henry’s youth as the child of Chinese immigrant parents forcing him to both “be American” and adhere to the customs of his ancestors. He feels out of place among both his Chinese and American peers until he meets Keiko.

I won’t give much away, but Henry’s young life was changed forever when Keiko and her family were sent, along with the rest of the Japanese-Americans in the area, to an internment camp hours away. Henry and Keiko both struggle with trying to reconcile the lives they want with the lives that are unfolding before them. Ultimately, it’s a story of making choices and moving forward. Henry puts it best when he says, “The hardest choices in life aren’t between what’s right and what’s wrong but between what’s right and what’s best.”

The subplot of the story focuses on Henry and his son Marty. The two seemed to be linked only by their late wife and mother’s presence, but now it’s up to them to rediscover each other and reconnect on their own terms. Marty learns a lot about his father, but it’s Marty who forces Henry to rethink everything. A man who’s lived his whole life without stopping to think of what could have been now learns that maybe you can look back.

***

The book is a quick read, and it will more than likely tug on your heartstrings. While I didn’t cry on the beach, I did cry on my morning commute (public transportation, mind you)  more than once. The love is genuine, the pain is palpable and the story is set in one of our country’s darkest hours. It’s hard not to get emotional.

The story reminds me of my all time favorite read, Love in the Time of Cholera in that it explores the often rough transition from the idealistic romanticism of youth and the practical realism that comes with age. Our first loves are entirely emotional and overwhelming and sometimes in direct contrast to the other things we (and those around us) want for our lives. Both books suggest that true love can (and often does) come from a very practical place. We form deep bonds with people who fit neatly and easily into our lives. We are drawn (for good reason) towards those who are compatible with us, and the love we create with those people is no less real or passionate because of it’s convenience. However, both books remind us that that all-consuming, passionate, irrational first love comes once in a lifetime if you’re lucky, and if it happens to come around again, it should not be taken lightly.

My only critique of the book is that most of the story is supposed to be told by a 12 year old, yet the writing is incredibly mature. It makes for a very eloquently told story, but it doesn’t feel authentic. It’s Ford’s first major work, so it seems likely that he’s yet to find his own voice, but when he does, I expect his books to get better and better.

 

July Wrap Up and August Goals

I love August. Both my sister’s birthdays are in August (they’re actually the same day 11 years apart. how cool is that?), and I know it sounds crazy, but I love the dog days of summer. I like the heat. Bring it on.

Here’s an update on my progress for my yearly goals:

  • Complete 12 random acts of kindness- Done! Obviously, I’ll keep doing these, but I’m so happy I was able to achieve this goal. Felt good doing it!
  • Pay off my car- Done!
  • Donate 24 hours of my time-6 hours in, 18 hours to go. I’ve been working more with my sorority, but it’s hard to gauge the time commitment. I’m going to say that I probably spent about 4 hours this month reading and responding to emails and planning our initial retreat. Said retreat is this month, so I expect even more hours in August.
  • Run 2 half marathons- Not yet. We’re still halfway there, and I know that I said we’d run the Jersey Shore Half, but there’s actually a change of plans. This summer has been jam packed with so many fun things, which is amazing, but it also means that we’ve been busy almost every single night and weekend. That’s not really conducive to a training plan. Chris and I gave it a shot and stuck with the plan for two weeks, but once we realized that we were just stressing ourselves out, we decided to change course. We’re still running, but we’re not on a training plan, and we’re hoping to find a half marathon in late November which should allow us to start training in September. Any ideas??
  • Learn 3 new skills- 0 this month for a total of 5. That doesn’t feel right, so I’m hoping I just forgot something, but if I can’t remember it, it probably wasn’t too important anyway.
  • Read 12 books- Done! This month I finished Game of Thrones: A Song of Ice and Fire (review coming soon!) for a total of 12 books for the year. I skipped a book club selection for the first time ever and felt like a total rebel, and I’m inclined to skip this month too because Hotel on the Corner of Bitter and Sweet seems wildly depressing, but it also looks interesting, so maybe I’ll give it a go. Chris just finished 11/22/63 by Stephen King and can’t stop raving about it, so that’s definitely on my “to-read” list as well.

Miles run- 55.3 for a total of 367.87 for the year. (plus 69 miles biked in July!)

Don’t think I forgot about my summer goals and bucket list either!

  • Get thee to yoga!- Totally gotten! I tried both rooftop yoga and outdoor yoga in Hoboken for a total of 4 hours yoga’d. That means I went once a week, every week this month. Go me! I can notice a difference too. Not only do I feel more flexible and stable on my runs, but I also feel more relaxed and grounded. I’m so glad that I went when I did because now I feel like I can really appreciate and enjoy the rest of summer.
  • Explore Jersey City

  • Take a hike- No hikes yet, but I did find this great resource for finding potential spots to hike around New York and New Jersey, so I’m more excited than ever to check it out.

  • Get to the beach!!- Done! A few weekends ago, Chris and I went to Long Branch, NJ. We ran along the boardwalk, got lunch and lounged on the beach. The traffic and parking situation were miserable, but it’s always worth it after that first moment when you sink your toes into the sand and just listen to the waves crashing all around you. I love the beach, and I love New Jersey.

Don’t think I forgot about my Summer Bucket List either!

  • Check out Groove on Grove

  • Visit the Central Park Zoo
  • Go to a Mets game
  • Run a small town 5k
  • Walk the Brooklyn Bridge
  • Bike from WTC, back to NJ over the George Washington Bridge oh we definitely did this one!

  • Dust off my passport

  • Watch the sunset with that favorite boy of mine

Not bad at all, and we’ve still got a month of summer left! I don’t have any August specific goals (I think I’ve set quite enough already), so I think I’ll just keep ticking away at these. Any goal list that includes “go eat ice cream” is fine by me.

***

Now tell me, how to you plan to make August awesome?